Відео

What a mess! Crew Dragon is far more modern!

What a hunk of junk,,,it looks like they used the A/C Control knob off a 94' Ford Escort on their control panels..they wwe probably defective parts Boeing got wholesale at auction...I hope to god these two make it back ok.

Looks so messy.....

unas cajas de zapatos hábilmente ensambladas. Interesante

This ship is from ‘90s. It’ s a nosense. SpaceX is on another planet. I hope u can repair that scrap and come back on earth soon

I mean it’s stuck in space at the moment

Based on looks alone? This thing looks like a scam, considering it's worth

The International space station is extremely Fatphobic. Canceled

i’ve run 3QX 80 when I was in the head on accident and and nobody in the cabin was harmed. I love the sound of a V-8 when you step on the gas turbo engines run hot 80s before the 2025 we naturally aspirated the new 2025QX 80 is nowhere is nice or as good of a vehicle.

Muy bonito. Para cuando sale a la venta?

i hope they dont columbia

Cool

They can keep launching rockets but we cant modify our cars exhausts and run open headers.

Stairliner looks more chaotic in my opinion

Wow! What a heap of tripe.

Boeing STARLEAKER is an antiquated out of date pile of junk made by a company whose motto is "money before human life". get rid of boeing from the space program they owe the american people over $4.4 billion for this pile of junk. they both are being very dishonest for boeing and we all know it

Be careful blowing all that gas out , the climate activists will come and paint your lander !! But nice landing

Terrible audio

Too bad Stall-Liner can't be used as a lifeboat, let alone head back to earth. Waiting for the announcement that they plan on sending a SpaceX Dragon to pick them up. The question is: What to do with Stall-Liner with no working thrusters?

The Boeing Control Panel looks like something out of 1975 while the SpaceX Panel looks like something from 2275. Nuff said?

Looks like a cramped mess. Crew Dragon is luxury compared to this old mess. Looks like something from the 1960s.

A miniature version of the Space Shuttles.

This looks so ancient compared to the Crew Dragon interior😂. You don't need those buttons if you trust in the engineers and software developers. They are heading to the right direction but just backwards.

So spacex is like airbus and boeing is basically boeing.

Starliner looks like a Rube Goldberg science project slapped together by seventh graders compared to Dragon. Just wondering where the marble goes.

So it took them far over budget to make a pod from the 80's that barley fuctioned enough to get into LEO?😂

Brand new but already looks old 😅

How was the background music synchronized with the video scenes?

3 different vehicles to get to the ISS now!

Wouldn’t trust a Boeing product

LOOKS LIKE TRASH

That thumbnail doesn't really help

This suv will faill in india if it launch with 3 cylinders engine bcoz of poor service network and poor resale value of Renault cars And renault hv the history to lauch suv in overpriced amount like we see in duster and lodgy cars prices

why does ISS look like a garbage dump now ?

Hello this is your captain "speaking we are now approaching the international station please wear you're seat belt and get comfortable" lol "Boeing starliner

I sure hope it manages to make it back. It has quality issues...no big surprise. Best prayers to the crew.

LOL 3:13 yeah no payload to be seen here. WTF is this? some kind of SPACEX shred😆

"Space witch doesn't exist" Space witch: "Okay, hello everybody"

Ichuju or Isuzu??????

Still no Automatic gear box?

Wow, Best design I m going for it😂

For pilots, the cockpit of Starliner looks a lot more familiar. Truthfully, if I had to pick a spacecraft I would choose Starliner over Crew Dragon. Something about hyper-digitalized systems *in space* just gives me anxieties what with cosmic rays flipping bits and the many things that can go wrong. I would prefer greater control authority if required, and the system and flight controls of Starliner look to be much, much more comprehensive in scope.

Starliner? Looks like a claustrophobic nightmare to me.

Old fashioned roof aerial…

Oh my God! Watch everybody as these poor Astronaut laboratory-volunteers, try to -- "Put Lipstick on this fat PIG! Every single Mechanical panel switch contact internally is a single point of failure for spark-arcing to cause volatile gas ignition! Also many toggle switches appear unprotected, as many lack side rails for impact activation prevention from weightless passenger free-floating heel-kicks, breakage or inadvertent activation. GUESS 5 BILLION DOLLARS CONTRACT COST WAS NOT ENOUGH! (BOEING PROVIDES THE "FULL" CONTROL PANEL SWITCH SIDE PROTECTION COVERAGE IN THE 6 BILLION DOLLAR PACKAGE MODEL!) Moreover, leaks from storage of volatile capsule propellants or ISS gas buildup or leakage into the atmosphere; seeping to voids reaching gas ignition arcs, is well documented and a known hazardous gas tank issue, that astronaut faced from the "dawn of space electronics" and a unacceptable risk at every mechanical-switch contact open or closure. These are Boeing and NASA ignored are gas ignition sparks. This is electronics 101, very basic and WELL known to occur with every switch-contact opening or closure; and is taking place somewhere behind BOEING'S flight control panels. This is tantamount to hundreds of BOMB triggers in the Astronaut's faces. In years past you have heard of the Airforce paying $500 for an aircraft toilet seat; so this Starshitter capsule is NASA's version but it cost the taxpayer nearly $5 BILLION DOLLARS! How Stupid NASA Inspectors or project managers, (probably hoping to work at Boeing in their next occupation) could swallow and eat the bullshit technobable from Boeing is traitorous to astronauts lives. That they allowed the "Green-Lighting" approvals of this "Archaic-Death-Trap", especially after knowing full-well about the failure mode analysis of the tragedy of Apollo One, is simply irresponsibility to the highest degree! SpaceX touch panels are brilliance and extreme SAFETY-FORWARD in spirit and execution fully in ALL aspects; from physical spark elimination to spark-free, high-power SCR or transistor or IC software controlled sparkless-solid-state relays. The SpaceX Dragon concepts deserve from the top-down, the international "RED engineering Design Award" If not from capabilities alone of operations-control remoting capabilities of wifi transfer of control to knee or perhaps wrist worn compute capability . BOEING RIPPED OFF THE AMERICAN TAXPAYER TO CHARGE NEARLY 5 BILLION DOLLARS FOR STARSH*TER! AND THE BOEING CEO IS THE BIGGEST THIEF WHO FROM A SALARY OF 15 MILLION DOLLARS LAST YEAR 2023, VOTES HIMSELF AN UNDESERVED IMO 45% INCREASE of gravy-train-like TAXPAYER DOLLARS THIS YEAR! AND ALL YOU NAIVE BOEING KISS ASS IDIOTS OR COMPANY PLANTS.OR RETIRED, BLIND NASA FLAG WAVING ENGINEERS, SMILE LIKE YOU ARE GETTING A GREAT DEAL FROM BOEING! THINK OF IT! EVEN OUR OLD ANTIQUATED VOYAGER ONE AND TWO ARE STILL better technical engineering then BOEING'S STARSH*Ter cobbled from a 60 year-old Gemini I CAPSULE PARTS SCAVENGE NASA needs to FIRE the Astronaut-managers who don't know Fu*k about engineering who spearhead this clown show and cancel the STARSH*tter contract IMMEDIATELY! ELSE THE USA CANT AFFORD EVER AGAIN. HOW NASA MANAGERS AND PM clowns FIREHOSE PISS OUR TAX DOLLARS INTO THE GUTTER. BUT MAYBE ONE DAY ILL LET YOU KNOW HOW I REALLY FEEL!

We want 7 seater EV

Boeing? Has anything fell off? Watch those rivets!

Imagine being a navy person and getting starboard and port wrong

Sweet tatts SUnny

Very disappointing using zip ties on duck piping, I can now see why they are having helium leaks, the helium provides pressure the maneuver ing thruster fuel tanks, no helium no maneuvering control. What a super disorganized craft design.